Tax Calculator

Paycheck Tax Calculator

All comparisons
Minnesota flagRhode Island flag2026

Minnesota vs Rhode Island RSU Tax

Minnesota withholds $130 more state tax than Rhode Island on $50,000 RSU vest (100 shares × $500 FMV) with $150,000 other annual income (flat supplemental method).

By Sammy S. · Founder · AuthorUpdated for 2026

Key finding

Minnesota withholds more state tax

$130 more state tax — net gap ~$130 ($33,011 vs $33,141).

Side-by-side RSU withholding scoreboard

Minnesota

$3,125

6.25% state

Total withheld
$16,989
Net RSU
$33,011
Federal + FICA
$13,864
Rank
#11
Minnesota profile →

Total withholding gap: $130 (state drives most of the difference).

Key takeaways — Minnesota vs Rhode Island RSU tax

  • Minnesota withholds about $130 more state tax ($3,125 vs $2,995).
  • Minnesota: 6.25% (Published flat supplemental). Rhode Island: 5.99% (Published flat supplemental).
  • Federal withholding is $11,000 in both states on this vignette (22% flat per IRS Pub. 15); FICA is $2,864 each.
  • Minnesota ranks #11; Rhode Island ranks #13 (#1 = highest state withholding).
  • Model custom RSU vests at /rsu-tax-calculator.

Rule contrast — Minnesota vs Rhode Island

TopicMinnesotaRhode Island
Withholding methodPublished flat supplementalPublished flat supplemental
Supplemental rate6.25%5.99%
Vignette state tax$3,125$2,995
Vignette federal + FICA$11,000 + $2,864$11,000 + $2,864
Vignette total withheld$16,989$16,859
Vignette net$33,011$33,141
Rank (curated)#11#13

State withholding and net at different RSU sizes

$150,000 other annual income; engine flat supplemental method. State gap is state tax only; net is after-tax share value after sell-to-cover.

RSUMinnesota stateRhode Island stateState gapMN netRI net
$15,000$937.50$898.50$39$9,615$9,654
$50,000$3,125$2,995$130$33,011$33,141
$100,000$6,250$5,990$260$67,711$67,971
$250,000$15,625$14,975$650$171,811$172,461

How to read this page

Minnesota vs Rhode Island RSU tax in 2026

This page compares state supplemental withholding for Minnesota (MN) and Rhode Island (RI) on $50,000 RSU vest (100 shares × $500 FMV) with $150,000 other annual income (flat supplemental method), calculated from our engine (same engine as the RSU vest calculator).

Minnesota is higher by about $130 in state tax alone; net take-home favors Rhode Island by about $130.

Published state supplemental withholding at 6.25% on RSUs and other supplemental wages.

Published state supplemental withholding at 5.99% on RSUs and other supplemental wages.

How each state’s rate works

Minnesota (Published flat supplemental): about 6.25% → $3,125 on the vignette.

Rhode Island (Published flat supplemental): about 5.99% → $2,995 on the vignette.

Official state agencies for this pair only are linked in the sources section — not every state in the hub.

Federal and FICA are the same on this vignette

Both states withhold $11,000 federal income tax under the Pub. 15 flat method (22% on $50,000).

FICA is $2,864 in each (Social Security + Medicare on this YTD/RSU pair). The take-home gap is almost entirely state supplemental withholding.

Above $1M supplemental wages with one employer, federal withholding uses 37% on the excess — still the same rule in both states.

Same RSU vests, different state tax

The ladder recomputes engine results at $15k–$250k RSU vests with $150,000 other annual income.

When both sides use flat (or flat-PIT proxy) rates, the dollar gap scales roughly with RSU size.

Signing-RSU negotiations should still include regular wage tax and cost of living — not supplemental withholding alone.

What this comparison excludes

Local city taxes (NYC, Philly wage tax, Ohio municipalities) are not included.

Aggregate-method stubs can differ from the flat-percentage estimates shown here.

Final Form 1040 liability depends on annual brackets, deductions, and credits — withholding is a prepayment.

Who this Minnesota vs Rhode Island comparison helps

Useful if…

  • •Candidates weighing Minnesota vs Rhode Island offers with cash RSU vests
  • •Payroll comparing multi-state supplemental setup
  • •Editors quantifying high-tax vs no-tax state gaps

Use official tools if…

  • •Local city taxes (NYC, Philly, Ohio municipalities)
  • •Aggregate-method stubs that differ from flat rates
  • •Year-end true-up if federal 22% under-withholds

Minnesota vs Rhode Island checklist

Before treating the withholding gap as a job or relocation decision.

  1. 1Confirm Minnesota and Rhode Island supplemental rules with each revenue department.
  2. 2Ask which withholding method payroll uses (flat vs aggregate).
  3. 3Check the RSU vest ladder for your award size.
  4. 4Open /rsu-tax-by-state/minnesota and /rsu-tax-by-state/rhode-island for full profiles.
  5. 5Run both scenarios in /rsu-tax-calculator.

Vignette net: $33,011 (MN) vs $33,141 (RI).

What the state gap means

Flat supplemental rates differ by state; federal 22% and FICA rules are the same. Withholding is not your final tax bill when you file.

Limits of this comparison

NYC/local taxes, aggregate-method withholding, and equity vest timing are not modeled. Use the RSU calculator for custom vest amounts and other income.

Minnesota vs Rhode Island RSU tax FAQs

Minnesota withholds about $130 more in state tax ($3,125 vs $2,995).

No on this vignette — both use the flat 22% federal supplemental method plus the same FICA rules. The gap is almost entirely state supplemental withholding.

Minnesota: 6.25%. Rhode Island: 5.99%.

Rhode Island, by about $130.

No. This comparison is state supplemental withholding plus federal and FICA only.

Not on this vignette. Both use 22% flat federal supplemental withholding ($11,000) plus the same FICA rules.

Compare another pair

Compare any two states

Supplemental RSU withholding on a $50,000 vest (100×$500) with $150,000 other income.