Tax Calculator

Paycheck Tax Calculator

All comparisons
Minnesota flagWisconsin flag2026

Minnesota vs Wisconsin RSU Tax

Minnesota withholds $475 more state tax than Wisconsin on $50,000 RSU vest (100 shares × $500 FMV) with $150,000 other annual income (flat supplemental method).

By Sammy S. · Founder · AuthorUpdated for 2026

Key finding

Minnesota withholds more state tax

$475 more state tax — net gap ~$475 ($33,011 vs $33,486).

Side-by-side RSU withholding scoreboard

Minnesota

$3,125

6.25% state

Total withheld
$16,989
Net RSU
$33,011
Federal + FICA
$13,864
Rank
#11
Minnesota profile →

Wisconsin

$2,650

5.3% state

Total withheld
$16,514
Net RSU
$33,486
Federal + FICA
$13,864
Rank
#17
Wisconsin profile →

Total withholding gap: $475 (state drives most of the difference).

Key takeaways — Minnesota vs Wisconsin RSU tax

  • Minnesota withholds about $475 more state tax ($3,125 vs $2,650).
  • Minnesota: 6.25% (Published flat supplemental). Wisconsin: 5.3% (WI graduated supplemental bands).
  • Federal withholding is $11,000 in both states on this vignette (22% flat per IRS Pub. 15); FICA is $2,864 each.
  • Minnesota ranks #11; Wisconsin ranks #17 (#1 = highest state withholding).
  • Model custom RSU vests at /rsu-tax-calculator.

Rule contrast — Minnesota vs Wisconsin

TopicMinnesotaWisconsin
Withholding methodPublished flat supplementalWI graduated supplemental bands
Supplemental rate6.25%5.3%
Vignette state tax$3,125$2,650
Vignette federal + FICA$11,000 + $2,864$11,000 + $2,864
Vignette total withheld$16,989$16,514
Vignette net$33,011$33,486
Rank (curated)#11#17

State withholding and net at different RSU sizes

$150,000 other annual income; engine flat supplemental method. State gap is state tax only; net is after-tax share value after sell-to-cover.

RSUMinnesota stateWisconsin stateState gapMN netWI net
$15,000$937.50$795$142.50$9,615$9,757.50
$50,000$3,125$2,650$475$33,011$33,486
$100,000$6,250$5,300$950$67,711$68,661
$250,000$15,625$19,125$3,500$171,811$168,311

How to read this page

Minnesota vs Wisconsin RSU tax in 2026

This page compares state supplemental withholding for Minnesota (MN) and Wisconsin (WI) on $50,000 RSU vest (100 shares × $500 FMV) with $150,000 other annual income (flat supplemental method), calculated from our engine (same engine as the RSU vest calculator).

Minnesota is higher by about $475 in state tax alone; net take-home favors Wisconsin by about $475.

Published state supplemental withholding at 6.25% on RSUs and other supplemental wages.

Wisconsin uses graduated supplemental bands by annual wages; this vignette falls in the 5.3% band.

How each state’s rate works

Minnesota (Published flat supplemental): about 6.25% → $3,125 on the vignette.

Wisconsin (WI graduated supplemental bands): about 5.3% → $2,650 on the vignette.

Official state agencies for this pair only are linked in the sources section — not every state in the hub.

Federal and FICA are the same on this vignette

Both states withhold $11,000 federal income tax under the Pub. 15 flat method (22% on $50,000).

FICA is $2,864 in each (Social Security + Medicare on this YTD/RSU pair). The take-home gap is almost entirely state supplemental withholding.

Above $1M supplemental wages with one employer, federal withholding uses 37% on the excess — still the same rule in both states.

Same RSU vests, different state tax

The ladder recomputes engine results at $15k–$250k RSU vests with $150,000 other annual income.

If either state uses Vermont’s 30%-of-federal rule, Wisconsin bands, or an aggregate proxy, the gap may not scale as a simple constant percentage — check each ladder row.

Signing-RSU negotiations should still include regular wage tax and cost of living — not supplemental withholding alone.

What this comparison excludes

Local city taxes (NYC, Philly wage tax, Ohio municipalities) are not included.

Aggregate-method stubs can differ from the flat-percentage estimates shown here.

Final Form 1040 liability depends on annual brackets, deductions, and credits — withholding is a prepayment.

Who this Minnesota vs Wisconsin comparison helps

Useful if…

  • •Candidates weighing Minnesota vs Wisconsin offers with cash RSU vests
  • •Payroll comparing multi-state supplemental setup
  • •Editors quantifying high-tax vs no-tax state gaps

Use official tools if…

  • •Local city taxes (NYC, Philly, Ohio municipalities)
  • •Aggregate-method stubs that differ from flat rates
  • •Year-end true-up if federal 22% under-withholds

Minnesota vs Wisconsin checklist

Before treating the withholding gap as a job or relocation decision.

  1. 1Confirm Minnesota and Wisconsin supplemental rules with each revenue department.
  2. 2Ask which withholding method payroll uses (flat vs aggregate).
  3. 3Check the RSU vest ladder for your award size.
  4. 4Open /rsu-tax-by-state/minnesota and /rsu-tax-by-state/wisconsin for full profiles.
  5. 5Run both scenarios in /rsu-tax-calculator.

Vignette net: $33,011 (MN) vs $33,486 (WI).

What the state gap means

Flat supplemental rates differ by state; federal 22% and FICA rules are the same. Withholding is not your final tax bill when you file.

Limits of this comparison

NYC/local taxes, aggregate-method withholding, and equity vest timing are not modeled. Use the RSU calculator for custom vest amounts and other income.

Minnesota vs Wisconsin RSU tax FAQs

Minnesota withholds about $475 more in state tax ($3,125 vs $2,650).

No on this vignette — both use the flat 22% federal supplemental method plus the same FICA rules. The gap is almost entirely state supplemental withholding.

Minnesota: 6.25%. Wisconsin: 5.3%.

Wisconsin, by about $475.

No. This comparison is state supplemental withholding plus federal and FICA only.

Not on this vignette. Both use 22% flat federal supplemental withholding ($11,000) plus the same FICA rules.