Tax Calculator

Paycheck Tax Calculator

All comparisons
Minnesota flagSouth Carolina flag2026

Minnesota vs South Carolina Bonus Tax

Minnesota withholds $25 more state tax than South Carolina on $10,000 bonus with $80,000 year-to-date wages (flat supplemental method).

By Sammy S. · Founder · AuthorUpdated for 2026

Key finding

Minnesota withholds more state tax

$25 more state tax — net gap ~$25 ($6,410 vs $6,435).

Side-by-side bonus withholding scoreboard

Minnesota

$625

6.25% state

Total withheld
$3,590
Net bonus
$6,410
Federal + FICA
$2,965
Rank
#11
Minnesota profile →

Total withholding gap: $25 (state drives most of the difference).

Key takeaways — Minnesota vs South Carolina bonus tax

  • Minnesota withholds about $25 more state tax ($625 vs $600).
  • Minnesota: 6.25% (Published flat supplemental). South Carolina: ~6% est. (Aggregate / table (estimate)).
  • Federal withholding is $2,200 in both states on this vignette (22% flat per IRS Pub. 15); FICA is $765 each.
  • Minnesota ranks #11; South Carolina ranks #12 (#1 = highest state withholding).
  • Model custom bonuses at /bonus-tax-calculator.

Rule contrast — Minnesota vs South Carolina

TopicMinnesotaSouth Carolina
Withholding methodPublished flat supplementalAggregate / table (estimate)
Supplemental rate6.25%~6% est.
Vignette state tax$625$600
Vignette federal + FICA$2,200 + $765$2,200 + $765
Vignette total withheld$3,590$3,565
Vignette net$6,410$6,435
Rank (curated)#11#12

State withholding and net at different bonus sizes

$80,000 YTD wages; engine flat supplemental method. State gap is state tax only; net columns include federal and FICA.

BonusMinnesota stateSouth Carolina stateState gapMN netSC net
$5,000$312.50$300$12.50$3,205$3,217.50
$10,000$625$600$25$6,410$6,435
$25,000$1,562.50$1,500$62.50$16,025$16,087.50
$50,000$3,125$3,000$125$32,050$32,175

How to read this page

Minnesota vs South Carolina bonus tax in 2026

This page compares state supplemental withholding for Minnesota (MN) and South Carolina (SC) on $10,000 bonus with $80,000 year-to-date wages (flat supplemental method), calculated from our engine (same engine as the bonus calculator).

Minnesota is higher by about $25 in state tax alone; net take-home favors South Carolina by about $25.

Published state supplemental withholding at 6.25% on bonus and other supplemental wages.

No published flat supplemental rate (aggregate / table method). Educational estimate ≈6% — confirm with payroll tables.

How each state’s rate works

Minnesota (Published flat supplemental): about 6.25% → $625 on the vignette.

South Carolina (Aggregate / table (estimate)): about 6% → $600 on the vignette.

Official state agencies for this pair only are linked in the sources section — not every state in the hub.

Federal and FICA are the same on this vignette

Both states withhold $2,200 federal income tax under the Pub. 15 flat method (22% on $10,000).

FICA is $765 in each (Social Security + Medicare on this YTD/bonus pair). The take-home gap is almost entirely state supplemental withholding.

Above $1M supplemental wages with one employer, federal withholding uses 37% on the excess — still the same rule in both states.

Same bonuses, different state tax

The ladder recomputes engine results at $5k–$50k bonuses with $80,000 YTD wages.

If either state uses Vermont’s 30%-of-federal rule, Wisconsin bands, or an aggregate proxy, the gap may not scale as a simple constant percentage — check each ladder row.

Signing-bonus negotiations should still include regular wage tax and cost of living — not supplemental withholding alone.

What this comparison excludes

Local city taxes (NYC, Philly wage tax, Ohio municipalities) are not included.

Aggregate-method stubs can differ from the flat-percentage estimates shown here.

Final Form 1040 liability depends on annual brackets, deductions, and credits — withholding is a prepayment.

Who this Minnesota vs South Carolina comparison helps

Useful if…

  • •Candidates weighing Minnesota vs South Carolina offers with cash bonuses
  • •Payroll comparing multi-state supplemental setup
  • •Editors quantifying high-tax vs no-tax state gaps

Use official tools if…

  • •Local city taxes (NYC, Philly, Ohio municipalities)
  • •Aggregate-method stubs that differ from flat rates
  • •Year-end true-up if federal 22% under-withholds

Minnesota vs South Carolina checklist

Before treating the withholding gap as a job or relocation decision.

  1. 1Confirm Minnesota and South Carolina supplemental rules with each revenue department.
  2. 2Ask which withholding method payroll uses (flat vs aggregate).
  3. 3Check the bonus ladder for your award size.
  4. 4Open /bonus-tax-by-state/minnesota and /bonus-tax-by-state/south-carolina for full profiles.
  5. 5Run both scenarios in /bonus-tax-calculator.

Vignette net: $6,410 (MN) vs $6,435 (SC).

What the state gap means

Flat supplemental rates differ by state; federal 22% and FICA rules are the same. Withholding is not your final tax bill when you file.

Limits of this comparison

NYC/local taxes, aggregate-method withholding, and equity vest timing are not modeled. Use the bonus calculator for custom amounts and YTD wages.

Minnesota vs South Carolina bonus tax FAQs

Minnesota withholds about $25 more in state tax ($625 vs $600).

No on this vignette — both use the flat 22% federal supplemental method plus the same FICA rules. The gap is almost entirely state supplemental withholding.

Minnesota: 6.25%. South Carolina: ~6% est..

South Carolina, by about $25.

No. This comparison is state supplemental withholding plus federal and FICA only.

Not on this vignette. Both use 22% flat federal supplemental withholding ($2,200) plus the same FICA rules.

Compare another pair

Compare any two states

Supplemental bonus withholding on a $10,000 bonus with $80,000 YTD wages.