Tax Calculator

Paycheck Tax Calculator

All comparisons
Massachusetts flagNew Hampshire flag2026

Massachusetts vs New Hampshire RSU Tax

Massachusetts withholds $2,500 more state tax than New Hampshire on $50,000 RSU vest (100 shares × $500 FMV) with $150,000 other annual income (flat supplemental method).

By Sammy S. · Founder · AuthorUpdated for 2026

Key finding

Massachusetts withholds more state tax

$2,500 more state tax — net gap ~$2,500 ($33,636 vs $36,136).

Side-by-side RSU withholding scoreboard

Total withholding gap: $2,500 (state drives most of the difference).

Key takeaways — Massachusetts vs New Hampshire RSU tax

  • Massachusetts withholds about $2,500 more state tax ($2,500 vs $0).
  • Massachusetts: ~5% PIT (Flat PIT proxy (no separate table)). New Hampshire: No state tax (No state wage tax).
  • Federal withholding is $11,000 in both states on this vignette (22% flat per IRS Pub. 15); FICA is $2,864 each.
  • Massachusetts ranks #21; New Hampshire ranks #46 (#1 = highest state withholding).
  • Model custom RSU vests at /rsu-tax-calculator.

Rule contrast — Massachusetts vs New Hampshire

TopicMassachusettsNew Hampshire
Withholding methodFlat PIT proxy (no separate table)No state wage tax
Supplemental rate~5% PITNo state tax
Vignette state tax$2,500$0
Vignette federal + FICA$11,000 + $2,864$11,000 + $2,864
Vignette total withheld$16,364$13,864
Vignette net$33,636$36,136
Rank (curated)#21#46

State withholding and net at different RSU sizes

$150,000 other annual income; engine flat supplemental method. State gap is state tax only; net is after-tax share value after sell-to-cover.

RSUMassachusetts stateNew Hampshire stateState gapMA netNH net
$15,000$750$0$750$9,802.50$10,552.50
$50,000$2,500$0$2,500$33,636$36,136
$100,000$5,000$0$5,000$68,961$73,961
$250,000$12,500$0$12,500$174,936$187,436

How to read this page

Massachusetts vs New Hampshire RSU tax in 2026

This page compares state supplemental withholding for Massachusetts (MA) and New Hampshire (NH) on $50,000 RSU vest (100 shares × $500 FMV) with $150,000 other annual income (flat supplemental method), calculated from our engine (same engine as the RSU vest calculator).

Massachusetts is higher by about $2,500 in state tax alone; net take-home favors New Hampshire by about $2,500.

No separate supplemental table; educational estimate uses the state’s flat PIT ≈5%.

No wage income tax (interest/dividends tax repealed) — $0 state supplemental withholding on RSU vests.

How each state’s rate works

Massachusetts (Flat PIT proxy (no separate table)): about 5% → $2,500 on the vignette.

New Hampshire withholds $0 state income tax on RSU vests.

Official state agencies for this pair only are linked in the sources section — not every state in the hub.

Federal and FICA are the same on this vignette

Both states withhold $11,000 federal income tax under the Pub. 15 flat method (22% on $50,000).

FICA is $2,864 in each (Social Security + Medicare on this YTD/RSU pair). The take-home gap is almost entirely state supplemental withholding.

Above $1M supplemental wages with one employer, federal withholding uses 37% on the excess — still the same rule in both states.

Same RSU vests, different state tax

The ladder recomputes engine results at $15k–$250k RSU vests with $150,000 other annual income.

If either state uses Vermont’s 30%-of-federal rule, Wisconsin bands, or an aggregate proxy, the gap may not scale as a simple constant percentage — check each ladder row.

Signing-RSU negotiations should still include regular wage tax and cost of living — not supplemental withholding alone.

What this comparison excludes

Local city taxes (NYC, Philly wage tax, Ohio municipalities) are not included.

Aggregate-method stubs can differ from the flat-percentage estimates shown here.

Final Form 1040 liability depends on annual brackets, deductions, and credits — withholding is a prepayment.

Who this Massachusetts vs New Hampshire comparison helps

Useful if…

  • •Candidates weighing Massachusetts vs New Hampshire offers with cash RSU vests
  • •Payroll comparing multi-state supplemental setup
  • •Editors quantifying high-tax vs no-tax state gaps

Use official tools if…

  • •Local city taxes (NYC, Philly, Ohio municipalities)
  • •Aggregate-method stubs that differ from flat rates
  • •Year-end true-up if federal 22% under-withholds

Massachusetts vs New Hampshire checklist

Before treating the withholding gap as a job or relocation decision.

  1. 1Confirm Massachusetts and New Hampshire supplemental rules with each revenue department.
  2. 2Ask which withholding method payroll uses (flat vs aggregate).
  3. 3Check the RSU vest ladder for your award size.
  4. 4Open /rsu-tax-by-state/massachusetts and /rsu-tax-by-state/new-hampshire for full profiles.
  5. 5Run both scenarios in /rsu-tax-calculator.

Vignette net: $33,636 (MA) vs $36,136 (NH).

What the state gap means

Flat supplemental rates differ by state; federal 22% and FICA rules are the same. Withholding is not your final tax bill when you file.

Limits of this comparison

NYC/local taxes, aggregate-method withholding, and equity vest timing are not modeled. Use the RSU calculator for custom vest amounts and other income.

Massachusetts vs New Hampshire RSU tax FAQs

Massachusetts withholds about $2,500 more in state tax ($2,500 vs $0).

No on this vignette — both use the flat 22% federal supplemental method plus the same FICA rules. The gap is almost entirely state supplemental withholding.

Massachusetts: ~5% PIT. New Hampshire: No state tax.

New Hampshire, by about $2,500.

No. This comparison is state supplemental withholding plus federal and FICA only.

Not on this vignette. Both use 22% flat federal supplemental withholding ($11,000) plus the same FICA rules.