Alaska
$0
No state tax state
- Total withheld
- $13,864
- Net RSU
- $36,136
- Federal + FICA
- $13,864
- Rank
- #43
Compare different states
2026
2026Alaska vs Florida RSU Tax
Alaska and Florida withhold $0 state tax on the vignette RSU.
By Sammy S. · Founder · AuthorUpdated for 2026
Key finding
Alaska and Florida tie on state withholding
Both withhold $0 state tax on $50,000 RSU vest (100 shares × $500 FMV) with $150,000 other annual income (flat supplemental method).
Side-by-side RSU withholding scoreboard
Florida
$0
No state tax state
- Total withheld
- $13,864
- Net RSU
- $36,136
- Federal + FICA
- $13,864
- Rank
- #44
Key takeaways — Alaska vs Florida RSU tax
- Alaska and Florida both withhold about $0 state tax on $50,000 RSU vest (100 shares × $500 FMV) with $150,000 other annual income (flat supplemental method).
- Alaska: No state tax (No state wage tax). Florida: No state tax (No state wage tax).
- Federal withholding is $11,000 in both states on this vignette (22% flat per IRS Pub. 15); FICA is $2,864 each.
- Alaska ranks #43; Florida ranks #44 (#1 = highest state withholding).
- Model custom RSU vests at /rsu-tax-calculator.
Rule contrast — Alaska vs Florida
| Topic | Alaska | Florida |
|---|---|---|
| Withholding method | No state wage tax | No state wage tax |
| Supplemental rate | No state tax | No state tax |
| Vignette state tax | $0 | $0 |
| Vignette federal + FICA | $11,000 + $2,864 | $11,000 + $2,864 |
| Vignette total withheld | $13,864 | $13,864 |
| Vignette net | $36,136 | $36,136 |
| Rank (curated) | #43 | #44 |
State withholding and net at different RSU sizes
$150,000 other annual income; engine flat supplemental method. State gap is state tax only; net is after-tax share value after sell-to-cover.
| RSU | Alaska state | Florida state | State gap | AK net | FL net |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $15,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $10,552.50 | $10,552.50 |
| $50,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $36,136 | $36,136 |
| $100,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $73,961 | $73,961 |
| $250,000 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $187,436 | $187,436 |
How to read this page
Alaska vs Florida RSU tax in 2026
This page compares state supplemental withholding for Alaska (AK) and Florida (FL) on $50,000 RSU vest (100 shares × $500 FMV) with $150,000 other annual income (flat supplemental method), calculated from our engine (same engine as the RSU vest calculator).
State withholding ties at about $0. Net RSU still depends on federal and FICA.
No state wage income tax — $0 state supplemental withholding on RSU vests.
No state wage income tax — $0 state supplemental withholding on RSU vests.
How each state’s rate works
Alaska withholds $0 state income tax on RSU vests.
Florida withholds $0 state income tax on RSU vests.
Official state agencies for this pair only are linked in the sources section — not every state in the hub.
Federal and FICA are the same on this vignette
Both states withhold $11,000 federal income tax under the Pub. 15 flat method (22% on $50,000).
FICA is $2,864 in each (Social Security + Medicare on this YTD/RSU pair). The take-home gap is almost entirely state supplemental withholding.
Above $1M supplemental wages with one employer, federal withholding uses 37% on the excess — still the same rule in both states.
Same RSU vests, different state tax
The ladder recomputes engine results at $15k–$250k RSU vests with $150,000 other annual income.
If either state uses Vermont’s 30%-of-federal rule, Wisconsin bands, or an aggregate proxy, the gap may not scale as a simple constant percentage — check each ladder row.
Signing-RSU negotiations should still include regular wage tax and cost of living — not supplemental withholding alone.
What this comparison excludes
Local city taxes (NYC, Philly wage tax, Ohio municipalities) are not included.
Aggregate-method stubs can differ from the flat-percentage estimates shown here.
Final Form 1040 liability depends on annual brackets, deductions, and credits — withholding is a prepayment.
Who this Alaska vs Florida comparison helps
Useful if…
- •Candidates weighing Alaska vs Florida offers with cash RSU vests
- •Payroll comparing multi-state supplemental setup
- •Editors quantifying high-tax vs no-tax state gaps
Use official tools if…
- •Local city taxes (NYC, Philly, Ohio municipalities)
- •Aggregate-method stubs that differ from flat rates
- •Year-end true-up if federal 22% under-withholds
Alaska vs Florida checklist
Before treating the withholding gap as a job or relocation decision.
- 1Confirm Alaska and Florida supplemental rules with each revenue department.
- 2Ask which withholding method payroll uses (flat vs aggregate).
- 3Check the RSU vest ladder for your award size.
- 4Open /rsu-tax-by-state/alaska and /rsu-tax-by-state/florida for full profiles.
- 5Run both scenarios in /rsu-tax-calculator.
Vignette net: $36,136 (AK) vs $36,136 (FL).
What the state gap means
Identical supplemental rates on this vignette — compare regular wage tax and cost of living separately.
Limits of this comparison
NYC/local taxes, aggregate-method withholding, and equity vest timing are not modeled. Use the RSU calculator for custom vest amounts and other income.
Alaska vs Florida RSU tax FAQs
Alaska and Florida withhold the same state tax on this vignette ($0).
No on this vignette — both use the flat 22% federal supplemental method plus the same FICA rules. The gap is almost entirely state supplemental withholding.
Alaska: No state tax. Florida: No state tax.
They tie at about $36,136 net.
No. This comparison is state supplemental withholding plus federal and FICA only.
Not on this vignette. Both use 22% flat federal supplemental withholding ($11,000) plus the same FICA rules.
Compare another pair
Compare any two states
Supplemental RSU withholding on a $50,000 vest (100×$500) with $150,000 other income.
Related RSU tax comparisons
Related tools
RSU tax calculatorModel any vest amount, FMV, and other incomeBonus tax by stateSame supplemental rates on cash bonusesBonus tax calculatorCash bonus withholding vignetteSalary comparison by stateTake-home on regular wagesUS paycheck calculatorFederal, state, and FICA take-homeEquity vesting calculatorSchedule vesting across grants