Weekly max gap
$1,423
Minnesota higher
Minnesota lists a higher modeled weekly maximum. Compare PFML status, weekly caps, family weeks, payroll premiums, and sick-leave rules.
By Sammy S. · Founder · AuthorUpdated for 2026
Weekly max gap
$1,423
Minnesota higher
Family weeks gap
12
Minnesota longer
Premium gap at $80k
$352
North Dakota lower rate
No statewide PFML
Max weekly · rank #38
$1,423
Max weekly · rank #4
| Metric | North Dakota | Minnesota | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max weekly | $0 | $1,423 | $1,423 |
| Family weeks | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Employee premium | 0% | 0.44% | 0.44% |
| Est. annual premium ($80k) | $0 | $352 | $352 |
Max weekly
Family weeks
Premium at $80k
PFML status, weeks, premiums, and sick-leave mandates side by side.
| Metric | North Dakota | Minnesota |
|---|---|---|
| PFML status | No statewide PFML | Active PFML program |
| Program | — | Minnesota Paid Family and Medical Leave |
| Max weekly benefitMinnesota higher by $1,423 | — | $1,423 |
| Family / bonding weeksMinnesota longer by 12 | — | 12 |
| Medical weeks (modeled) | See disability / separate track | 12 |
| Wage replacement (typical) | — | 9% |
| Employee premiumNorth Dakota lower (~$352/yr at $80,000) | None / n/a | 0.44% |
| Paid sick / any-reason | No statewide sick-leave mandate | Paid sick leave mandate |
Illustrative totals if every week paid the modeled maximum. Caps stop at each state’s family weeks when shorter. Most claimants earn less than the maximum.
| Scenario | North Dakota | Minnesota | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 weeks at weekly max | — | $5,692 | $5,692 |
| 8 weeks at weekly max | — | $11,384 | $11,384 |
| 12 weeks at weekly max | — | $17,076 | $17,076 |
Comparing paid leave between North Dakota and Minnesota means stacking three layers: mandatory PFML cash benefits (where they exist), statewide paid sick or any-reason leave mandates, and unpaid federal FMLA job protection. This page uses the same 2026 planning snapshot as the paid-leave hub.
North Dakota shows no statewide pfml. Minnesota shows active pfml program at $1,423/week and 12 family weeks.
If you optimize for cash benefits, Minnesota leads on weekly maximum and Minnesota leads on family weeks—premiums and sick-leave rules can still flip the “better” package for a given worker.
At the weekly maximum for a full family-leave allotment, North Dakota could approach no statewide max total (0 weeks) and Minnesota $17,076 (12 weeks)—only if every week pays the published maximum.
Employee payroll shares model at 0% in North Dakota (~$0/year on $80,000) versus 0.44% in Minnesota (~$352/year). The gap is about 0.44% / $352 annually on that wage example.
Wage replacement midpoints are about n/a in North Dakota and 9% in Minnesota before caps. Waiting periods, claim type, and private plans can change cash paid.
North Dakota: No statewide private-employer paid sick leave mandate (cities/counties or employers may still provide leave). Minnesota: Statewide earned sick and safe time.
Short sick or any-reason leave banks are not a substitute for multi-week PFML bonding benefits. A state can lead on sick leave and still lack mandatory PFML—or the reverse.
FMLA can run alongside state PFML for eligible employees of covered employers, but it does not pay wages. Job restoration rules depend on employer size, tenure, and which statute applies—not on which state has the higher weekly max.
Choose the higher weekly max if your wages would hit the cap and you need maximum cash replacement during bonding or family care.
Choose more family weeks if bonding length matters more than the weekly dollar cap—especially when medical and family weeks share a combined annual ceiling.
Weigh employee premiums and sick-leave mandates for everyday short absences. Relocating for leave benefits alone is rarely enough without checking cost of living, wages, and employer policies.
Before treating rankings as a relocation or offer decision.
Compare any two states
PFML weekly max, weeks, premiums, and paid sick leave mandates.
Chart-based estimates. Confirm claims and premiums with state agencies.