Tax Calculator

Paycheck Tax Calculator

All comparisons
Iowa flagMinnesota flag2026

Iowa vs Minnesota Paid Leave

Minnesota lists a higher modeled weekly maximum. Compare PFML status, weekly caps, family weeks, payroll premiums, and sick-leave rules.

By Sammy S. · Founder · AuthorUpdated for 2026

Weekly max gap

$1,423

Minnesota higher

Family weeks gap

12

Minnesota longer

Premium gap at $80k

$352

Iowa lower rate

Side-by-side paid leave scoreboard

Iowa

No statewide PFML

Max weekly · rank #25

PFML status
No statewide PFML
Family weeks
0
Employee premium
—
No statewide sick-leave mandate
Iowa profile →

Minnesota

$1,423

Max weekly · rank #4

PFML status
Active PFML program
Family weeks
12
Employee premium
0.44%
Paid sick leave mandate
Minnesota profile →

Benefit metric comparison

Max weekly

Iowa$0
Minnesota$1,423

Family weeks

Iowa0
Minnesota12

Premium at $80k

Iowa$0
Minnesota$352

Key takeaways — Iowa vs Minnesota paid leave

  • Iowa has no mandatory statewide PFML insurance; Minnesota has an active PFML program (Minnesota Paid Family and Medical Leave).
  • Minnesota lists the higher modeled weekly maximum ($1,423 vs $0, gap $1,423).
  • Minnesota models more family/bonding weeks (12 vs 0).
  • Iowa has the lower employee PFML premium (~0%), saving about $352/year on a $80,000 wage example before wage-base caps.
  • Iowa: No statewide sick-leave mandate. Minnesota: Paid sick leave mandate.
  • Federal FMLA remains unpaid job protection—it does not replace a PFML paycheck in either state.

Iowa vs Minnesota leave scorecard

PFML status, weeks, premiums, and sick-leave mandates side by side.

MetricIowaMinnesota
PFML statusNo statewide PFMLActive PFML program
Program—Minnesota Paid Family and Medical Leave
Max weekly benefitMinnesota higher by $1,423—$1,423
Family / bonding weeksMinnesota longer by 12—12
Medical weeks (modeled)See disability / separate track12
Wage replacement (typical)—9%
Employee premiumIowa lower (~$352/yr at $80,000)None / n/a0.44%
Paid sick / any-reasonNo statewide sick-leave mandatePaid sick leave mandate

PFML at weekly max — claim length scenarios

Illustrative totals if every week paid the modeled maximum. Caps stop at each state’s family weeks when shorter. Most claimants earn less than the maximum.

ScenarioIowaMinnesotaGap
4 weeks at weekly max—$5,692$5,692
8 weeks at weekly max—$11,384$11,384
12 weeks at weekly max—$17,076$17,076

How to read this page

Iowa vs Minnesota paid leave in 2026

Comparing paid leave between Iowa and Minnesota means stacking three layers: mandatory PFML cash benefits (where they exist), statewide paid sick or any-reason leave mandates, and unpaid federal FMLA job protection. This page uses the same 2026 planning snapshot as the paid-leave hub.

Iowa shows no statewide pfml. Minnesota shows active pfml program at $1,423/week and 12 family weeks.

If you optimize for cash benefits, Minnesota leads on weekly maximum and Minnesota leads on family weeks—premiums and sick-leave rules can still flip the “better” package for a given worker.

Benefits and premiums: Iowa vs Minnesota

At the weekly maximum for a full family-leave allotment, Iowa could approach no statewide max total (0 weeks) and Minnesota $17,076 (12 weeks)—only if every week pays the published maximum.

Employee payroll shares model at 0% in Iowa (~$0/year on $80,000) versus 0.44% in Minnesota (~$352/year). The gap is about 0.44% / $352 annually on that wage example.

Wage replacement midpoints are about n/a in Iowa and 9% in Minnesota before caps. Waiting periods, claim type, and private plans can change cash paid.

PFML vs sick leave vs FMLA in this pair

Iowa: No statewide private-employer paid sick leave mandate (cities/counties or employers may still provide leave). Minnesota: Statewide earned sick and safe time.

Short sick or any-reason leave banks are not a substitute for multi-week PFML bonding benefits. A state can lead on sick leave and still lack mandatory PFML—or the reverse.

FMLA can run alongside state PFML for eligible employees of covered employers, but it does not pay wages. Job restoration rules depend on employer size, tenure, and which statute applies—not on which state has the higher weekly max.

When Iowa or Minnesota looks better for leave

Choose the higher weekly max if your wages would hit the cap and you need maximum cash replacement during bonding or family care.

Choose more family weeks if bonding length matters more than the weekly dollar cap—especially when medical and family weeks share a combined annual ceiling.

Weigh employee premiums and sick-leave mandates for everyday short absences. Relocating for leave benefits alone is rarely enough without checking cost of living, wages, and employer policies.

Who this Iowa vs Minnesota comparison helps

Useful if…

  • •Candidates comparing job offers or remote bases in Iowa vs Minnesota.
  • •Parents estimating bonding leave wage replacement and payroll deductions.
  • •HR teams mapping multi-state PFML and sick-leave compliance.
  • •Workers weighing whether sick-leave mandates offset a missing PFML program.

Use official tools if…

  • •You need an official claim determination, waiting period, or private-plan approval.
  • •Your hours or employer size fall below statutory thresholds.
  • •City ordinances exceed the statewide sick-leave rules modeled here.
  • •You are self-employed and need opt-in PFML rules rather than employee coverage.

Iowa vs Minnesota checklist

Before treating rankings as a relocation or offer decision.

  1. 1Confirm PFML status: Iowa (No statewide PFML) vs Minnesota (Active PFML program).
  2. 2Compare weekly max ($0 vs $1,423) and family weeks (0 vs 12).
  3. 3Estimate employee premiums on your wage (example gap ~$352 at $80,000).
  4. 4Review sick/any-reason leave separately from PFML week counts.
  5. 5Document FMLA eligibility if you need job protection alongside cash benefits.
  6. 6Open each state profile and confirm agency rules before relocating for leave alone.

Iowa vs Minnesota paid leave FAQs

Iowa: No statewide PFML. Minnesota: Active PFML program (Minnesota Paid Family and Medical Leave).

Minnesota lists a higher modeled weekly maximum ($1,423 vs $0).

Iowa models 0 family/bonding weeks; Minnesota models 12. Medical-leave weeks and combined caps can differ — check each profile.

Iowa employee rate ~0%; Minnesota ~0.44%. On $80,000 wages that is about $0 vs $352 per year (before wage-base caps).

Iowa: No statewide sick-leave mandate. Minnesota: Paid sick leave mandate. No statewide private-employer paid sick leave mandate (cities/counties or employers may still provide leave). Statewide earned sick and safe time.

No. FMLA is unpaid job-protected leave for eligible employees of covered employers. State PFML programs (where active) can provide partial wage replacement during qualifying leave.

It depends whether you optimize for weekly maximum (Minnesota), weeks (Minnesota), premiums (Iowa), or sick-leave mandates. Read both profiles and confirm eligibility with the state agency.

At each state’s modeled weekly maximum for its family allotment, Iowa approaches no mandatory total and Minnesota $17,076 before taxes and offsets. Most claimants earn less than the maximum.

Iowa models the lower employee rate (0%). On $80,000 wages the annual gap is about $352 before wage-base caps.

Usually only for short illness- or appointment-related absences—not full bonding leave. Iowa: No statewide private-employer paid sick leave mandate (cities/counties or employers may still provide leave). Minnesota: Statewide earned sick and safe time. Use PFML (where active) or unpaid FMLA for multi-week bonding.

Not always. Weeks, premiums, sick-leave mandates, waiting periods, and employer PTO coordination matter. Minnesota leads on weekly max in this table, but check family weeks, combined caps, and claim rules before deciding.

Open Iowa (/paid-leave-by-state/iowa) and Minnesota (/paid-leave-by-state/minnesota) for program details, neighbor tables, and checklists.

Compare another pair

Compare any two states

PFML weekly max, weeks, premiums, and paid sick leave mandates.