Tax Calculator

Paycheck Tax Calculator

All comparisons
Idaho flagWashington flag2026

Idaho vs Washington Paid Leave

Washington lists a higher modeled weekly maximum. Compare PFML status, weekly caps, family weeks, payroll premiums, and sick-leave rules.

By Sammy S. · Founder · AuthorUpdated for 2026

Weekly max gap

$1,647

Washington higher

Family weeks gap

12

Washington longer

Premium gap at $80k

$646

Idaho lower rate

Side-by-side paid leave scoreboard

Idaho

No statewide PFML

Max weekly · rank #22

PFML status
No statewide PFML
Family weeks
0
Employee premium
—
No statewide sick-leave mandate
Idaho profile →

Washington

$1,647

Max weekly · rank #2

PFML status
Active PFML program
Family weeks
12
Employee premium
0.81%
Paid sick leave mandate
Washington profile →

Benefit metric comparison

Max weekly

Idaho$0
Washington$1,647

Family weeks

Idaho0
Washington12

Premium at $80k

Idaho$0
Washington$646

Key takeaways — Idaho vs Washington paid leave

  • Idaho has no mandatory statewide PFML insurance; Washington has an active PFML program (Washington Paid Family and Medical Leave).
  • Washington lists the higher modeled weekly maximum ($1,647 vs $0, gap $1,647).
  • Washington models more family/bonding weeks (12 vs 0).
  • Idaho has the lower employee PFML premium (~0%), saving about $646/year on a $80,000 wage example before wage-base caps.
  • Idaho: No statewide sick-leave mandate. Washington: Paid sick leave mandate.
  • Federal FMLA remains unpaid job protection—it does not replace a PFML paycheck in either state.

Idaho vs Washington leave scorecard

PFML status, weeks, premiums, and sick-leave mandates side by side.

MetricIdahoWashington
PFML statusNo statewide PFMLActive PFML program
Program—Washington Paid Family and Medical Leave
Max weekly benefitWashington higher by $1,647—$1,647
Family / bonding weeksWashington longer by 12—12
Medical weeks (modeled)See disability / separate track12
Wage replacement (typical)—9%
Employee premiumIdaho lower (~$646/yr at $80,000)None / n/a0.81%
Paid sick / any-reasonNo statewide sick-leave mandatePaid sick leave mandate

PFML at weekly max — claim length scenarios

Illustrative totals if every week paid the modeled maximum. Caps stop at each state’s family weeks when shorter. Most claimants earn less than the maximum.

ScenarioIdahoWashingtonGap
4 weeks at weekly max—$6,588$6,588
8 weeks at weekly max—$13,176$13,176
12 weeks at weekly max—$19,764$19,764

How to read this page

Idaho vs Washington paid leave in 2026

Comparing paid leave between Idaho and Washington means stacking three layers: mandatory PFML cash benefits (where they exist), statewide paid sick or any-reason leave mandates, and unpaid federal FMLA job protection. This page uses the same 2026 planning snapshot as the paid-leave hub.

Idaho shows no statewide pfml. Washington shows active pfml program at $1,647/week and 12 family weeks.

If you optimize for cash benefits, Washington leads on weekly maximum and Washington leads on family weeks—premiums and sick-leave rules can still flip the “better” package for a given worker.

Benefits and premiums: Idaho vs Washington

At the weekly maximum for a full family-leave allotment, Idaho could approach no statewide max total (0 weeks) and Washington $19,764 (12 weeks)—only if every week pays the published maximum.

Employee payroll shares model at 0% in Idaho (~$0/year on $80,000) versus 0.81% in Washington (~$646/year). The gap is about 0.81% / $646 annually on that wage example.

Wage replacement midpoints are about n/a in Idaho and 9% in Washington before caps. Waiting periods, claim type, and private plans can change cash paid.

PFML vs sick leave vs FMLA in this pair

Idaho: No statewide private-employer paid sick leave mandate (cities/counties or employers may still provide leave). Washington: Statewide paid sick leave.

Short sick or any-reason leave banks are not a substitute for multi-week PFML bonding benefits. A state can lead on sick leave and still lack mandatory PFML—or the reverse.

FMLA can run alongside state PFML for eligible employees of covered employers, but it does not pay wages. Job restoration rules depend on employer size, tenure, and which statute applies—not on which state has the higher weekly max.

When Idaho or Washington looks better for leave

Choose the higher weekly max if your wages would hit the cap and you need maximum cash replacement during bonding or family care.

Choose more family weeks if bonding length matters more than the weekly dollar cap—especially when medical and family weeks share a combined annual ceiling.

Weigh employee premiums and sick-leave mandates for everyday short absences. Relocating for leave benefits alone is rarely enough without checking cost of living, wages, and employer policies.

Who this Idaho vs Washington comparison helps

Useful if…

  • •Candidates comparing job offers or remote bases in Idaho vs Washington.
  • •Parents estimating bonding leave wage replacement and payroll deductions.
  • •HR teams mapping multi-state PFML and sick-leave compliance.
  • •Workers weighing whether sick-leave mandates offset a missing PFML program.

Use official tools if…

  • •You need an official claim determination, waiting period, or private-plan approval.
  • •Your hours or employer size fall below statutory thresholds.
  • •City ordinances exceed the statewide sick-leave rules modeled here.
  • •You are self-employed and need opt-in PFML rules rather than employee coverage.

Idaho vs Washington checklist

Before treating rankings as a relocation or offer decision.

  1. 1Confirm PFML status: Idaho (No statewide PFML) vs Washington (Active PFML program).
  2. 2Compare weekly max ($0 vs $1,647) and family weeks (0 vs 12).
  3. 3Estimate employee premiums on your wage (example gap ~$646 at $80,000).
  4. 4Review sick/any-reason leave separately from PFML week counts.
  5. 5Document FMLA eligibility if you need job protection alongside cash benefits.
  6. 6Open each state profile and confirm agency rules before relocating for leave alone.

Idaho vs Washington paid leave FAQs

Idaho: No statewide PFML. Washington: Active PFML program (Washington Paid Family and Medical Leave).

Washington lists a higher modeled weekly maximum ($1,647 vs $0).

Idaho models 0 family/bonding weeks; Washington models 12. Medical-leave weeks and combined caps can differ — check each profile.

Idaho employee rate ~0%; Washington ~0.81%. On $80,000 wages that is about $0 vs $646 per year (before wage-base caps).

Idaho: No statewide sick-leave mandate. Washington: Paid sick leave mandate. No statewide private-employer paid sick leave mandate (cities/counties or employers may still provide leave). Statewide paid sick leave.

No. FMLA is unpaid job-protected leave for eligible employees of covered employers. State PFML programs (where active) can provide partial wage replacement during qualifying leave.

It depends whether you optimize for weekly maximum (Washington), weeks (Washington), premiums (Idaho), or sick-leave mandates. Read both profiles and confirm eligibility with the state agency.

At each state’s modeled weekly maximum for its family allotment, Idaho approaches no mandatory total and Washington $19,764 before taxes and offsets. Most claimants earn less than the maximum.

Idaho models the lower employee rate (0%). On $80,000 wages the annual gap is about $646 before wage-base caps.

Usually only for short illness- or appointment-related absences—not full bonding leave. Idaho: No statewide private-employer paid sick leave mandate (cities/counties or employers may still provide leave). Washington: Statewide paid sick leave. Use PFML (where active) or unpaid FMLA for multi-week bonding.

Not always. Weeks, premiums, sick-leave mandates, waiting periods, and employer PTO coordination matter. Washington leads on weekly max in this table, but check family weeks, combined caps, and claim rules before deciding.

Open Idaho (/paid-leave-by-state/idaho) and Washington (/paid-leave-by-state/washington) for program details, neighbor tables, and checklists.

Compare another pair

Compare any two states

PFML weekly max, weeks, premiums, and paid sick leave mandates.