Wyoming vs 
Minnesota
Take-home pay after federal tax, state income tax, and FICA — calculated with the same engine as our paycheck calculator.
By Sammy S. · Founder · AuthorUpdated for 2026
Winner at $100k
Wyoming
Extra take-home / year
$5,037
Per month
$420
Over 10 years
$50,370
Moving from Minnesota → Wyoming at $100,000
Metric vs metric
Lower tax and cost figures generally favor the highlighted cell. Rate structure notes sit under each state's calculator link.
| Metric | Wyoming | Minnesota |
|---|---|---|
| Income tax | 0% · No state income tax (0%) | 9.85% · Progressive (top 9.85%) |
| Combined sales tax | ~5.39% | ~8.14% |
| Effective property tax | ~0.53% | ~1% |
| Cost of living index | 93.7 | 93.4 |
| Median household income | $72,800 | $86,800 |
| Unemployment rate | 3% | 2.9% |
Dig into each state's paycheck
Wyoming rate structure
No state income tax on wages; revenue relies more on sales and property taxes.
Minnesota rate structure
Progressive brackets with a top marginal rate of about 9.85%.
Overview
Wyoming has no state income tax, while Minnesota has progressive (top 9.85%). Staying in Wyoming (vs Minnesota) saves about $5,037/year in take-home at $100,000 gross (single filer). Sales tax: ~5.39% vs ~8.14%. Property tax: ~0.53% vs ~1%. Median household income (ACS 2024): $72,800 vs $86,800.
Take-home by income
Net pay after federal income tax, state income tax, and FICA — single filer, standard deduction, no dependents (2026). Advantage is take-home in Minnesota minus Wyoming.
| Gross | Wyoming take-home | Minnesota take-home | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $42,355 | $40,706 | −$1,649 |
| $75,000 | $61,593 | $58,256 | −$3,337 |
| $100,000Headline | $79,180 | $74,143 | −$5,037 |
| $150,000 | $113,791 | $105,074 | −$8,717 |
| $200,000 | $148,927 | $136,285 | −$12,642 |
| $500,000 | $340,477 | $298,533 | −$41,944 |
Assumptions: single filer, standard deduction, no dependents, tax year 2026. At $100k: FICA ≈ $7,650 in both states; effective total tax rate ≈ 20.8% in Wyoming vs 25.9% in Minnesota. Local city taxes are not included unless noted.
$100k tax breakdown: Wyoming vs Minnesota
Where a $100,000 paycheck goes after federal income tax, state income tax, and FICA (2026, single filer).
| Line item | Wyoming | Minnesota |
|---|---|---|
| Gross pay | $100,000 | $100,000 |
| Federal income tax (est.) | $13,170 | $13,170 |
| State income tax | $0 | $5,037 |
| FICA (SS + Medicare) | $7,650 | $7,650 |
| Take-home pay | $79,180 | $74,143 |
| Effective total tax rate | 20.8% | 25.9% |
| Monthly take-home | $6,598 | $6,179 |
Federal estimates can differ slightly between states when state interactions affect taxable income. Combined sales tax ~5.39% (Wyoming) vs ~8.14% (Minnesota); effective property tax ~0.53% vs ~1%.
Pros & cons: Wyoming vs Minnesota
Tax structure, living costs, and lifestyle trade-offs beyond the paycheck number.
Wyoming
Pros
- No state income tax on wages — $0 withholding vs Minnesota's state tax
- About $5,037/year more take-home at $100k gross (single) vs Minnesota
- Lower combined sales tax (~5.39% vs ~8.14% in Minnesota)
- Lower effective property tax (~0.53% vs ~1% in Minnesota)
Cons
- −Lower median household income ($72,800 ACS 2024 vs $86,800)
- −Local city/county taxes and credits are not fully modeled in the headline ladder
- −Housing, insurance, and wages can outweigh pure income-tax differences
Minnesota
Pros
- Higher median household income ($86,800 ACS 2024 vs $72,800)
- Modeled with our 2026 federal + state + FICA paycheck engine
- Use the Minnesota paycheck calculator for your filing status and deductions
Cons
- −State income tax (Progressive (top 9.85%)) reduces take-home vs a $0-income-tax peer
- −Roughly $5,037/year less take-home at $100k vs Wyoming
- −Higher combined sales tax (~8.14% vs ~5.39% in Wyoming)
- −Higher effective property tax (~1% vs ~0.53% in Wyoming)
Who wins when
Quick read on when each state is the better fit — beyond the headline tax number.
- Wyoming wins on take-home pay at every salary band in our ladder (single filer, standard deduction).
- Wyoming: No state income tax on wages — $0 withholding vs Minnesota's state tax
- Wyoming: About $5,037/year more take-home at $100k gross (single) vs Minnesota
- Minnesota: Higher median household income ($86,800 ACS 2024 vs $72,800)
- Minnesota: Modeled with our 2026 federal + state + FICA paycheck engine
How we calculate Wyoming vs Minnesota
Tax engine. Federal income tax uses 2026 IRS brackets and the standard deduction for a single filer. FICA includes Social Security and Medicare employee shares. State income tax applies Wyoming's and Minnesota's rules as modeled in our US calculator (No state income tax (0%) vs Progressive (top 9.85%)).
What's included. Wage income only — no capital gains, self-employment tax, itemized deductions, credits, or local city wage taxes (e.g. NYC) unless noted. Sales tax (~5.39% vs ~8.14%) and property tax (~0.53% vs ~1%) are context metrics, not subtracted from the take-home ladder.
Cost of living. COL indexes (93.7 vs 93.4, 100 = US average) and median household income ($72,800 vs $86,800) help interpret whether a paycheck win buys more in real life. For city-level equivalent salary, use the Wyoming → Minnesota relocation calculator.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions about Wyoming vs Minnesota taxes, take-home pay, and relocation.
Moving Wyoming → Minnesota?
Model cost-of-living equivalent salary, or open each state's paycheck calculator with your filing status and deductions.
Related tools
Estimates only for tax year 2026. Not tax advice — verify with your state tax agency or a CPA before relocating. Figures assume a single filer with the standard deduction and no dependents.