Wisconsin vs 
Utah
Take-home pay after federal tax, state income tax, and FICA — calculated with the same engine as our paycheck calculator.
By Sammy S. · Founder · AuthorUpdated for 2026
Winner at $100k
Wisconsin
Extra take-home / year
$281
Per month
$23
Over 10 years
$2,810
Moving from Utah → Wisconsin at $100,000
Metric vs metric
Lower tax and cost figures generally favor the highlighted cell. Rate structure notes sit under each state's calculator link.
| Metric | Wisconsin | Utah |
|---|---|---|
| Income tax | 7.65% · Progressive (top 7.65%) | 4.50% · Flat 4.50% |
| Combined sales tax | ~5.72% | ~7.42% |
| Effective property tax | ~1.32% | ~0.48% |
| Cost of living index | 97.4 | 100.6 |
| Median household income | $74,800 | $88,800 |
| Unemployment rate | 3% | 2.8% |
Dig into each state's paycheck
Wisconsin rate structure
Progressive brackets with a top marginal rate of about 7.65%.
Utah rate structure
Flat 4.50% state income tax on taxable wages (before credits).
Overview
Wisconsin (Progressive (top 7.65%)) vs Utah (Flat 4.50%). At $100,000 gross (single), Wisconsin typically leaves you with about $281 more take-home than Utah after federal, state, and FICA. Sales tax ~5.72% vs ~7.42%; property tax ~1.32% vs ~0.48%. Median household income (ACS 2024): $74,800 vs $88,800.
Take-home by income
Net pay after federal income tax, state income tax, and FICA — single filer, standard deduction, no dependents (2026). Advantage is take-home in Utah minus Wisconsin.
| Gross | Wisconsin take-home | Utah take-home | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| $50,000 | $40,786 | $40,105 | −$681 |
| $75,000 | $58,698 | $58,218 | −$480 |
| $100,000Headline | $74,961 | $74,680 | −$281 |
| $150,000 | $106,922 | $107,041 | +$119 |
| $200,000 | $139,408 | $139,927 | +$519 |
| $500,000 | $311,025 | $317,977 | +$6,952 |
Assumptions: single filer, standard deduction, no dependents, tax year 2026. At $100k: FICA ≈ $7,650 in both states; effective total tax rate ≈ 25% in Wisconsin vs 25.3% in Utah. Local city taxes are not included unless noted.
$100k tax breakdown: Wisconsin vs Utah
Where a $100,000 paycheck goes after federal income tax, state income tax, and FICA (2026, single filer).
| Line item | Wisconsin | Utah |
|---|---|---|
| Gross pay | $100,000 | $100,000 |
| Federal income tax (est.) | $13,170 | $13,170 |
| State income tax | $4,219 | $4,500 |
| FICA (SS + Medicare) | $7,650 | $7,650 |
| Take-home pay | $74,961 | $74,680 |
| Effective total tax rate | 25% | 25.3% |
| Monthly take-home | $6,247 | $6,223 |
Federal estimates can differ slightly between states when state interactions affect taxable income. Combined sales tax ~5.72% (Wisconsin) vs ~7.42% (Utah); effective property tax ~1.32% vs ~0.48%.
Pros & cons: Wisconsin vs Utah
Tax structure, living costs, and lifestyle trade-offs beyond the paycheck number.
Wisconsin
Pros
- About $281/year more take-home at $100k gross (single) vs Utah
- Lower combined sales tax (~5.72% vs ~7.42% in Utah)
- Lower cost of living index (97.4 vs 100.6; 100 = US average)
Cons
- −State income tax (Progressive (top 7.65%)) reduces take-home vs a $0-income-tax peer
- −Higher effective property tax (~1.32% vs ~0.48% in Utah)
- −Lower median household income ($74,800 ACS 2024 vs $88,800)
Utah
Pros
- Lower top/marginal state rate (Flat 4.50%) than Wisconsin (Progressive (top 7.65%))
- Lower effective property tax (~0.48% vs ~1.32% in Wisconsin)
- Higher median household income ($88,800 ACS 2024 vs $74,800)
Cons
- −Roughly $281/year less take-home at $100k vs Wisconsin
- −Higher combined sales tax (~7.42% vs ~5.72% in Wisconsin)
- −Higher cost of living index (100.6 vs 97.4; 100 = US average)
Who wins when
Quick read on when each state is the better fit — beyond the headline tax number.
- Wisconsin wins on take-home pay at every salary band in our ladder (single filer, standard deduction).
- Wisconsin: About $281/year more take-home at $100k gross (single) vs Utah
- Wisconsin: Lower combined sales tax (~5.72% vs ~7.42% in Utah)
- Utah: Lower top/marginal state rate (Flat 4.50%) than Wisconsin (Progressive (top 7.65%))
- Utah: Lower effective property tax (~0.48% vs ~1.32% in Wisconsin)
How we calculate Wisconsin vs Utah
Tax engine. Federal income tax uses 2026 IRS brackets and the standard deduction for a single filer. FICA includes Social Security and Medicare employee shares. State income tax applies Wisconsin's and Utah's rules as modeled in our US calculator (Progressive (top 7.65%) vs Flat 4.50%).
What's included. Wage income only — no capital gains, self-employment tax, itemized deductions, credits, or local city wage taxes (e.g. NYC) unless noted. Sales tax (~5.72% vs ~7.42%) and property tax (~1.32% vs ~0.48%) are context metrics, not subtracted from the take-home ladder.
Cost of living. COL indexes (97.4 vs 100.6, 100 = US average) and median household income ($74,800 vs $88,800) help interpret whether a paycheck win buys more in real life. For city-level equivalent salary, use the Wisconsin → Utah relocation calculator.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions about Wisconsin vs Utah taxes, take-home pay, and relocation.
Moving Wisconsin → Utah?
Model cost-of-living equivalent salary, or open each state's paycheck calculator with your filing status and deductions.
Related tools
Estimates only for tax year 2026. Not tax advice — verify with your state tax agency or a CPA before relocating. Figures assume a single filer with the standard deduction and no dependents.