Tax Calculator

Paycheck Tax Calculator

All comparisons
Montana flagTexas flag

Montana vs Texas Rent vs Buy

Texas has the lower price-to-rent ratio (17.7× vs 30.1×).

By Sammy S. · Founder · AuthorUpdated for 2026

Lower price-to-rent ratio

Texas

Texas has the lower price-to-rent ratio (17.7× vs 30.1×).

Ratio gap: 12.4×

Rent vs buy scoreboard

Median rent
$1,177/mo
Median home
$425,400
Price-to-rent
30.1×
Modeled ownership
$2,894/mo
Monthly gap
$1,717/mo
Break-even (model)
30+ yrs (model)
Signal
Rent leans ahead
Texas Lower ratio
Median rent
$1,475/mo
Median home
$313,200
Price-to-rent
17.7×
Modeled ownership
$2,436/mo
Monthly gap
$961/mo
Break-even (model)
21 yrs
Signal
Rent leans ahead

What Montana vs Texas means for renters and buyers

Rent benchmark

ACS median gross rent is $1,177/mo in Montana and $1,475/mo in Texas. Monthly rent gap difference: $756/mo on modeled ownership minus rent.

Buy benchmark

Ownership model uses 6.66% financing, 1% maintenance, and 5% opportunity return on cash-to-close at each state's ACS median home value.

Montana vs Texas FAQs

Texas is higher ($1,475/mo vs $1,177/mo).

Montana is higher (30.1× vs 17.7×). Higher ratios often lean toward renting on this metric.

Texas is lower (17.7× vs 30.1×).

Montana: no break-even within 30 years. Texas: ~21 years under the same appreciation, rent-growth, and opportunity-return assumptions.

Montana shows the larger buy-over-rent monthly gap ($1,717/mo vs $961/mo) before equity.

Texas shows the smaller gap ($961/mo vs $1,717/mo).

Montana $425,400 vs Texas $313,200 (ACS median owner-occupied).

No. Both use the same Freddie Mac PMMS 6.66% 30-year fixed assumption (as of 2026-07-30) so the comparison isolates home prices, rents, property tax, and insurance.

Neither does — HOA defaults to $0 in both columns. Local dues can flip a close comparison.

Use this duel for housing-structure context, then compare wages, income taxes, insurance risk, and how long you will stay before deciding.