- Median rent
- $1,848/mo
- Median home
- $607,400
- Price-to-rent
- 27.4×
- Modeled ownership
- $4,291/mo
- Monthly gap
- $2,443/mo
- Break-even (model)
- 30+ yrs (model)
- Signal
- Rent leans ahead
Massachusetts vs New Hampshire Rent vs Buy
New Hampshire has the lower price-to-rent ratio (24.5× vs 27.4×).
By Sammy S. · Founder · AuthorUpdated for 2026
Lower price-to-rent ratio
New Hampshire
New Hampshire has the lower price-to-rent ratio (24.5× vs 27.4×).
Ratio gap: 2.9×
Rent vs buy scoreboard
- Median rent
- $1,558/mo
- Median home
- $458,800
- Price-to-rent
- 24.5×
- Modeled ownership
- $3,414/mo
- Monthly gap
- $1,856/mo
- Break-even (model)
- 30+ yrs (model)
- Signal
- Rent leans ahead
What Massachusetts vs New Hampshire means for renters and buyers
Rent benchmark
ACS median gross rent is $1,848/mo in Massachusetts and $1,558/mo in New Hampshire. Monthly rent gap difference: $587/mo on modeled ownership minus rent.
Buy benchmark
Ownership model uses 6.66% financing, 1% maintenance, and 5% opportunity return on cash-to-close at each state's ACS median home value.
Related tools
Rent vs buy calculatorPersonalize rent, price, and break-evenMortgage affordability calculatorPrice from income and debtsHomeownership cost by stateACS owner costs and buyer estimatesProperty tax by stateEffective rates and annual billsCost of living by stateIndexes and equivalent salariesProperty tax calculatorHome value + rate estimate
Compare a different pair
Compare any two states
Price-to-rent ratios, median rent, modeled ownership, and break-even context.
Massachusetts vs New Hampshire FAQs
Massachusetts is higher ($1,848/mo vs $1,558/mo).
Massachusetts is higher (27.4× vs 24.5×). Higher ratios often lean toward renting on this metric.
New Hampshire is lower (24.5× vs 27.4×).
Massachusetts: no break-even within 30 years. New Hampshire: no break-even within 30 years under the same appreciation, rent-growth, and opportunity-return assumptions.
Massachusetts shows the larger buy-over-rent monthly gap ($2,443/mo vs $1,856/mo) before equity.
New Hampshire shows the smaller gap ($1,856/mo vs $2,443/mo).
Massachusetts $607,400 vs New Hampshire $458,800 (ACS median owner-occupied).
No. Both use the same Freddie Mac PMMS 6.66% 30-year fixed assumption (as of 2026-07-30) so the comparison isolates home prices, rents, property tax, and insurance.
Neither does — HOA defaults to $0 in both columns. Local dues can flip a close comparison.
Use this duel for housing-structure context, then compare wages, income taxes, insurance risk, and how long you will stay before deciding.
By Sammy S. · Founder · AuthorUpdated for 2026