Minnesota
1%
Effective rate · rank #16
- Per $100k
- $1,000
- $500k annual
- $5,000
- $500k monthly
- $417
Compare different states
2026
2026Minnesota vs Massachusetts Property Tax
Minnesota and Massachusetts share a 1% effective rate. Compare annual and monthly estimates, ownership ladders, homestead caveats, and buyer checklists.
By Sammy S. · Founder · AuthorUpdated for 2026
Lower effective rate
Minnesota and Massachusetts are tied
Both benchmark at 1%.
Side-by-side property tax scoreboard
Massachusetts
1%
Effective rate · rank #16
- Per $100k
- $1,000
- $500k annual
- $5,000
- $500k monthly
- $417
Property tax by home value
Statewide effective-rate estimates before local rules and exemptions.
| Home value | Minnesota | Massachusetts | Annual difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| $200,000 | $2,000 | $2,000 | $0 |
| $300,000 | $3,000 | $3,000 | $0 |
| $500,000 | $5,000 | $5,000 | $0 |
| $750,000 | $7,500 | $7,500 | $0 |
| $1,000,000 | $10,000 | $10,000 | $0 |
$200,000 home
Minnesota$2,000
Massachusetts$2,000
Difference: $0/year
$300,000 home
Minnesota$3,000
Massachusetts$3,000
Difference: $0/year
$500,000 home
Minnesota$5,000
Massachusetts$5,000
Difference: $0/year
$750,000 home
Minnesota$7,500
Massachusetts$7,500
Difference: $0/year
Home price matters
At $500,000, the estimated annual gap is $0. A lower-rate state can still have a higher bill if homes cost more.
Local rates vary
County, city, school, and special-district levies can make two addresses in the same state materially different.
Ten-year illustration
Holding value and rates constant, the $500,000-home gap totals about $0 over ten years.
Key finding — Minnesota vs Massachusetts property tax
Minnesota and Massachusetts are tied at 1% in the Tax Foundation 2026 effective property tax table (ACS 2024). Local assessments and exemptions still decide the real bill.
Key takeaways — Minnesota vs Massachusetts
- Minnesota and Massachusetts share a 1% effective property tax rate in the 2026 Tax Foundation table (ACS 2024).
- Minnesota ranks #16 nationally; Massachusetts ranks #16 (#1 = highest effective rate).
- On a $500,000 home both states model about $5,000 per year before local rules.
- Compared with the 0.9% unweighted 50-state average: Minnesota is above; Massachusetts is above.
- These are ACS owner-occupied effective rates — not your parcel’s millage. Homestead caps and sale-triggered reassessment can flip the practical winner.
Annual & monthly estimates — Minnesota vs Massachusetts
Statewide effective-rate models before exemptions and local assessment rules. Useful for escrow planning, not a substitute for the parcel record.
$300,000 home
Minnesota$3,000/yr
$250/mo
Massachusetts$3,000/yr
$250/mo
Gap: $0/year
$500,000 home
Minnesota$5,000/yr
$417/mo
Massachusetts$5,000/yr
$417/mo
Gap: $0/year
$750,000 home
Minnesota$7,500/yr
$625/mo
Massachusetts$7,500/yr
$625/mo
Gap: $0/year
Ownership cost ladder ($500k home)
Cumulative tax if home value and statewide effective rates stay constant. Real bills drift with levies and reassessment.
| Hold period | Minnesota | Massachusetts | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | $5,000 | $5,000 | $0 |
| 5-year hold | $25,000 | $25,000 | $0 |
| 10-year hold | $50,000 | $50,000 | $0 |
| 20-year hold | $100,000 | $100,000 | $0 |
How to read this page
Minnesota vs Massachusetts property tax in 2026
Homebuyers and relocators comparing Minnesota and Massachusetts often start with statewide effective property tax rates — taxes paid as a share of owner-occupied home value. This page uses the Tax Foundation 2026 table built from 2024 American Community Survey data.
Minnesota and Massachusetts share the same 1% statewide benchmark. Dollar bills can still diverge because home prices, assessment ratios, school districts, and exemptions differ.
Open each state profile for rankings, FAQs, and neighbor states, or use the pair picker to swap destinations.
What these effective rates mean
Statutory millage is not comparable across states when assessment ratios differ. A 20-mill levy on 50% of market value is not the same burden as 20 mills on 100% of market value.
Effective rates solve that by dividing real estate taxes paid by owner-occupied housing value in ACS data. They are the fair cross-state benchmark for relocation screening — not a substitute for the assessor’s parcel record.
Minnesota benchmarks at 1% (rank #16); Massachusetts at 1% (rank #16). Each 1% of effective rate equals about $1,000 per year per $100,000 of home value.
When the tie can reverse
Sale-triggered reassessment and assessment caps (including California Prop 13–style limits and Florida homestead caps) can make a new owner’s bill look nothing like the prior owner’s.
Investor or second-home classification can lose homestead relief or face higher assessment ratios (South Carolina’s 4% vs 6% owner vs investor split is a sharp example).
Home prices matter as much as rates: a lower-rate state with much higher median prices can still produce a larger dollar bill than a higher-rate, lower-price market.
Budgeting ownership in Minnesota vs Massachusetts
Holding a $500,000 taxable value constant, both states model about $5,000 per year — roughly $417 per month for escrow planning.
Mortgage escrow estimates are forecasts: the first full tax year after purchase often differs once the assessor posts the buyer’s taxable value.
Qualifying real estate taxes may be itemized federally as part of SALT, subject to the current annual limit — a deduction reduces taxable income, not the property tax bill itself.
Planning tips for this comparison
Model the buyer’s bill
Copying the seller’s last tax bill understates cost when caps reset at sale.
Separate rate from price
A lower effective rate on a much more expensive home can still cost more dollars.
Stack other taxes
No-income-tax states often lean on property and sales tax — compare total household burden.
Budget levy drift
Local governments reset millage annually; a 2–4% annual increase assumption is a common conservative plan.
Who this Minnesota vs Massachusetts comparison helps
Useful if…
- •Buyers choosing between homes in Minnesota and Massachusetts.
- •Remote workers and retirees screening relocation destinations by housing tax cost.
- •Anyone comparing annual escrow / ownership carrying costs across state lines.
- •Investors estimating how owner-occupied benchmarks differ from investor classification.
Confirm locally if…
- •You need a binding tax estimate for a specific parcel or closing disclosure.
- •Homestead, senior, veteran, or disability exemptions dominate your bill.
- •You are buying an investment or second home that loses owner-occupant relief.
- •County or school-district outliers are far from the statewide average.
Minnesota vs Massachusetts buyer checklist
Before treating the statewide rate gap as a closing-cost forecast.
- 1Confirm Minnesota 1% vs Massachusetts 1% (ranks #16 and #16).
- 2Size the gap at your expected purchase price using the home-value table.
- 3Ask whether sale triggers reassessment or resets an assessment cap.
- 4List county, city, school, and special-district levies on the parcel record.
- 5Verify which homestead or other exemptions you can claim after closing.
- 6Open the Minnesota and Massachusetts profiles, then run the property tax calculator for a planning estimate.
Rates shown as 1% (MN) vs 1% (MA).
Glossary for this comparison
- Effective property tax rate
- Property taxes paid ÷ owner-occupied home value (ACS), expressed as a percent — the cross-state benchmark used on this page.
- Assessed / taxable value
- The value the assessor uses after ratios, classifications, and caps. Often differs from market value.
- Homestead exemption
- Owner-occupant relief that reduces taxable value or tax due. Often unavailable to investors and may reset after a sale.
- Assessment cap
- Rules that limit how fast taxable value can rise for continuing owners. Sales often reset value toward market.
Minnesota vs Massachusetts property tax FAQs
Minnesota and Massachusetts share a 1% effective rate. The Tax Foundation benchmark is 1% in Minnesota and 1% in Massachusetts.
The statewide effective-rate estimates produce the same annual amount.
No. Property taxes are local. County, city, school district, assessment class, exemptions, and reassessment timing can materially change a bill.
It compares real estate taxes paid with owner-occupied housing value. It is useful across states because statutory millage and assessment ratios are not directly comparable.
Yes. Homestead, senior, veteran, disability, agricultural, and assessment-cap programs can reduce taxable value or tax due. Eligibility varies by state and locality.
Their statewide effective rates are tied; home value, local levies, insurance, and exemptions decide the practical difference.
Both model about $3,000 per year at the statewide effective rate before local rules.
On a $500,000 home both model about $417 per month before exemptions.
Minnesota at 1% is above the 0.9% unweighted average of the 50 statewide rates; Massachusetts at 1% is above.
Open the Minnesota profile (/property-tax-by-state/minnesota) and Massachusetts profile (/property-tax-by-state/massachusetts) for rankings, FAQs, and neighbor comparisons, or use the property tax calculator for a custom home value.
SALT itemizing can soften the after-tax cost of property tax for itemizers subject to the federal limit, but it does not change which state has the lower statewide effective rate or lower local levy.
Related tools
Property tax calculatorHome value + rate + exemption dollarsTotal tax burden by stateIncome, sales, and property togetherHomeownership cost by stateACS owner costs, insurance, taxesRent vs buy by statePrice-to-rent and ownership gapUS retiree tax destinationsSS + RMD vignette with property-tax estimatesRetirement taxes by stateSocial Security, pensions, estate taxes
Compare another pair
Compare any two states
Effective rates, annual estimates, monthly cost, and homeowner caveats.
Related property tax comparisons
Effective owner-occupied housing benchmarks only. Verify local assessed value, levies, exemptions, and post-sale reassessment before relying on an estimate.